Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

New York Strengthens Wage Laws

By Elise M. Bloom, Fredric C. Leffler and Thomas A. McKinney
August 25, 2008

Joining other states that have passed a spate of worker-friendly laws, New York has enacted several new and amended labor laws addressing a variety of workplace issues. These new laws, generally, expand employee rights by focusing on the payment of wages, time off, and enforcement. In light of recent aggressive enforcement efforts of New York's Labor Laws by both the New York State Attorney General's Office and the New York State Department of Labor (“NYSDOL”), prudent employers should consider the effect of these new enactments on their pay and leave practices and take action to ensure compliance.

Following one of the most active legislative periods in recent times, New York has enacted laws affecting the manner in which workers are paid, which will likely impact most employers. Due to raising the wage threshold for exemption from Article 6 of the New York Labor Law (“NYLL”), a larger number of employees now: 1) must be afforded the opportunity to consent before being paid through direct deposit; and 2) can sue under Section 198 of the NYLL when their employer fails to provide wages, benefits, or wage supplements in a timely fashion. In addition, the law now requires that the terms of compensation of a commissioned salesperson be memorialized in a writing signed by the employee and the employer, and that in the absence of such a writing, in any action for unpaid wages, it will be presumed that the terms of employment, including understandings as to when/how commissions are earned and paid, are as described by the commissioned salesperson. Given the repercussions associated with a failure to reduce to writing the compensation arrangement of a commission salesperson, employers need to know what types of payments constitute a “commission,” when an employee is a “Commission Salesperson” subject to Section 191(c) of the NYLL, and what to do about it. Employers also need to understand how the change in the wage threshold affects their exposure to wage lawsuits arising under the NYLL. This two-part article addresses these questions and summarizes the effect certain other changes in the NYLL will have on the workplace.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.