Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Picture this scenario: Six months after your company signs a contract for new technology, the project manager comes to your office for advice. Apparently, the project team thinks that Function X is part of the standard software, but the vendor insists that Function X requires customization and has provided a pricey quote. The project manager asks you to look at the contract (which, by the way, you originally reviewed) and tell her what it says. Crossing your fingers, you pull out the contract and quickly realize that the contract doesn't address Function X and worse yet, indicates that the vendor may be right!
I have to admit that this scenario is all too familiar. As in-house counsel, I was often asked to review contracts after a five-minute description from the project manager. When lucky, I was included as part of the project team that made the selection. In both situations, I found myself wondering whether I had done enough to address all of the vital elements in my contract review.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.