Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Drug & Device News

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
August 27, 2008

E-Prescription Program to Start Next Year

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) plans to implement a program to encourage prescribers of medication to use electronic prescribing systems by offering e-prescribers incentive payments. The program will begin in 2009 with a “carrot”: a 2% incentive payment to e-prescribers. In 2011, that payment will go down to 1%, and in 2013 to '%. In 2012 the “stick” will kick in ' eligible prescribers who do not use e-prescription methods will receive a reduction in payments under Medicare.

According to the Institute of Medicine (IOM), more than 1.5 million Americans are injured each year by drug errors. HHS estimates that the new system, which will produce electronic records of patients' drug use, will save Medicare up to $156 million over the five-year course of the program by helping patients avoid adverse drug events.

No Guilty Plea Without Guilt

A federal judge has refused to accept the Department-of-Justice-brokered guilty plea of Chi Yang, the founder of a Dublin-based biotech company that has been charged with fraud. The company, SynPep, synthesizes peptides ' linear chains of amino acids ' for laboratory customers, including the National Institute of Health, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Merck & Co. Inc. The company was charged with giving customers false measurements so that they would think the peptides they were receiving were the ones they ordered, rather than the less pure ones they were actually given. Yang agreed to plead guilty to making a false statement rather than to fraud, but the agree-upon sentence would remain harsh: Yang would accept a sentence of a year and a day, plus 12 months of home confinement, his company would shut down, and both he and the company would pay fines and/or restitution in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. However, when Yang entered his plea, Justice Sandra Armstrong demurred, stating, “It is not my practice to accept guilty pleas from people who are not guilty.” Problematic for the court was Yang's answer to the question of what role he had played in falsifying the purity measurements of the peptides. His answer: “I didn't do it. I didn't even know that peptide ship[ed] out, but the peptide was altered ' by the employees.” Judge Armstrong said, “I have to listen to what you say you did and what you didn't do. And then I have to decide on my own whether or not that makes you guilty of the crime. If it doesn't make you guilty of the crime, then I'm not going to take the guilty plea.” Yang's further assertions that he was indeed guilty proved unpersuasive to the court. A trial is scheduled for Nov. 3.

Hormone Replacement Drug Labels Enjoy Benefit of the Doubt

The 168 New Jersey plaintiffs alleging hormone replacement therapy (HRT) drugs caused them to contract breast cancer were delivered a blow on July 11 when the judge assigned to the lawsuits threw out the first two cases to come before the bench. Superior Court Judge Jamie Happas ruled in those cases that New Jersey's Products Liability Act's presumption of adequate labeling applied, and that the first two plaintiffs had failed to overcome that presumption with regard to the three suspect drugs they took to treat their menopausal symptoms: Premarin, Prempro and Provera. Wrote Happas, “The ultimate decision of the FDA to provide or not provide certain information in a prescription drug label can not be criticized unless a plaintiff has provided evidence of the pharmaceutical company's deliberate concealment or non-disclosure of after-acquired knowledge of harmful effects or if the pharmaceutical company was found to have manipulated the post-market regulatory process.” The dismissals came in what were supposed to be the first two HRT cases tried in New Jersey, Bailey v. Wyeth Inc., L-9999-06, scheduled for Sept. 15, and DeBoard v. Wyeth Inc., set for Oct. 27.

MS Drug Users Develop Rare Brain Infection

The manufacturers of multiple sclerosis (MS) drug Tysabri have announced that, once again, their product is implicated in the development of a rare brain infection in users. Tysabri, distributed jointly by Biogen Idec and Elan Corp., was taken off the market a few years ago after some patients taking it developed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopothy (PML), a brain infection that usually occurs only in people with weak immune systems. The consumers who got PML prior to the 2005 market withdrawal of Tysabri were taking other MS drugs besides Tysabri, and it is known that some other MS drugs weaken the immune system. When Tysabri went back on the market in 2006, people were advised not to combine it with other MS drugs. The two new cases of PML in Tysabri users occurred in patients who were not on other MS drugs but had previously used different MS medications.

E-Prescription Program to Start Next Year

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) plans to implement a program to encourage prescribers of medication to use electronic prescribing systems by offering e-prescribers incentive payments. The program will begin in 2009 with a “carrot”: a 2% incentive payment to e-prescribers. In 2011, that payment will go down to 1%, and in 2013 to '%. In 2012 the “stick” will kick in ' eligible prescribers who do not use e-prescription methods will receive a reduction in payments under Medicare.

According to the Institute of Medicine (IOM), more than 1.5 million Americans are injured each year by drug errors. HHS estimates that the new system, which will produce electronic records of patients' drug use, will save Medicare up to $156 million over the five-year course of the program by helping patients avoid adverse drug events.

No Guilty Plea Without Guilt

A federal judge has refused to accept the Department-of-Justice-brokered guilty plea of Chi Yang, the founder of a Dublin-based biotech company that has been charged with fraud. The company, SynPep, synthesizes peptides ' linear chains of amino acids ' for laboratory customers, including the National Institute of Health, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Merck & Co. Inc. The company was charged with giving customers false measurements so that they would think the peptides they were receiving were the ones they ordered, rather than the less pure ones they were actually given. Yang agreed to plead guilty to making a false statement rather than to fraud, but the agree-upon sentence would remain harsh: Yang would accept a sentence of a year and a day, plus 12 months of home confinement, his company would shut down, and both he and the company would pay fines and/or restitution in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. However, when Yang entered his plea, Justice Sandra Armstrong demurred, stating, “It is not my practice to accept guilty pleas from people who are not guilty.” Problematic for the court was Yang's answer to the question of what role he had played in falsifying the purity measurements of the peptides. His answer: “I didn't do it. I didn't even know that peptide ship[ed] out, but the peptide was altered ' by the employees.” Judge Armstrong said, “I have to listen to what you say you did and what you didn't do. And then I have to decide on my own whether or not that makes you guilty of the crime. If it doesn't make you guilty of the crime, then I'm not going to take the guilty plea.” Yang's further assertions that he was indeed guilty proved unpersuasive to the court. A trial is scheduled for Nov. 3.

Hormone Replacement Drug Labels Enjoy Benefit of the Doubt

The 168 New Jersey plaintiffs alleging hormone replacement therapy (HRT) drugs caused them to contract breast cancer were delivered a blow on July 11 when the judge assigned to the lawsuits threw out the first two cases to come before the bench. Superior Court Judge Jamie Happas ruled in those cases that New Jersey's Products Liability Act's presumption of adequate labeling applied, and that the first two plaintiffs had failed to overcome that presumption with regard to the three suspect drugs they took to treat their menopausal symptoms: Premarin, Prempro and Provera. Wrote Happas, “The ultimate decision of the FDA to provide or not provide certain information in a prescription drug label can not be criticized unless a plaintiff has provided evidence of the pharmaceutical company's deliberate concealment or non-disclosure of after-acquired knowledge of harmful effects or if the pharmaceutical company was found to have manipulated the post-market regulatory process.” The dismissals came in what were supposed to be the first two HRT cases tried in New Jersey, Bailey v. Wyeth Inc., L-9999-06, scheduled for Sept. 15, and DeBoard v. Wyeth Inc., set for Oct. 27.

MS Drug Users Develop Rare Brain Infection

The manufacturers of multiple sclerosis (MS) drug Tysabri have announced that, once again, their product is implicated in the development of a rare brain infection in users. Tysabri, distributed jointly by Biogen Idec and Elan Corp., was taken off the market a few years ago after some patients taking it developed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopothy (PML), a brain infection that usually occurs only in people with weak immune systems. The consumers who got PML prior to the 2005 market withdrawal of Tysabri were taking other MS drugs besides Tysabri, and it is known that some other MS drugs weaken the immune system. When Tysabri went back on the market in 2006, people were advised not to combine it with other MS drugs. The two new cases of PML in Tysabri users occurred in patients who were not on other MS drugs but had previously used different MS medications.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions Image

UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?