Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Court Finds Compelled Purchase Option in SILO Case
In the recently decided AWG Leasing Trust case, No. 1:07-CV-857 (N.D. Ohio 2008), a federal district court found against a taxpayer that engaged in a cross-border sale-leaseback of a waste-to-energy facility located in Germany. The court found, as a matter of fact, that the lessee, a consortium of German municipalities that burned its garbage and purchased electricity from the plant, was “nearly certain” to exercise its fixed price purchase option at the end of the lease term. Based on that finding of a compelled exercise of the purchase option, the court used a “substance over form” legal underpinning to hold that the leaseback was not a “true lease” ' use and possession of the asset were certain to be returned to the lessee at the end of the lease. The case is appealable to the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and we understand at press time that the taxpayers intend to appeal.
The court disregarded the sale-leaseback and disregarded the nonrecourse debt that the taxpayer had incurred to purchase the facility. The overall transaction was recharacterized as a financing (non-true lease) of the equity portion of the purchase price that was paid by the taxpayer lessor to the lessee at closing. This deemed loan from the lessor to the lessee results in original issue discount (interest) income to the lessor. In addition all of the depreciation and interest expense deductions claimed by the taxpayer with respect to the facility and the nonrecourse debt were disallowed.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
Discovery of Claim Construction and Infringement Analysis May be Compelled Prior to a Markman Hearing
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.