Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Phar-Mor, Inc., 2008 WL 2078787 (6th Cir. 2008) the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that the lower courts erred in their determination that once a lessor mitigates its damages by entering into a substitute lease, the lessor cannot claim damages from the original lessee for the period covered by the new lease if the substitute lessee subsequently defaults.
In this case, the original lessee and lessor were parties to a long-term lease for warehouse equipment. One year after the lessee's Chapter 11 filing, the lessee rejected the lease under ' 365(a) of the bankruptcy code. The lessor attempted to mitigate its damages by entering into a new lease, but that lessee also filed for bankruptcy. The lessor then sought damages from the original lessee. The original lessee objected, arguing that it was excused from liability as of the date the lessor entered into the subsequent lease, because that lease could have fully mitigated its damages. The Bankruptcy Court agreed with the original lessee, as did the District Court. The Circuit Court reversed and instead found for the lessor.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.