Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Almost every employer has experienced it: the employee who suddenly seems a little “off,” the rumors circulating among the co-workers that he is “odd,” “strange” or “crazy,” and then the resulting concerns from employees who are uncomfortable around, or fearful of, the labeled employee. Employers who take action because there are rumors that the employee is “crazy,” “psycho” or “nuts” often find themselves the subject of an Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) lawsuit facing claims that they regarded the individual as mentally disabled. What's an employer to do? How an employer handles concerns about an employee may be the difference between an amicable work environment and a lengthy and costly lawsuit.
The 'Regarded As' Prong of the ADA
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.