Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In a much anticipated opinion, the Second Circuit has affirmed the dismissal of an indictment against 13 former partners and employees of the accounting firm KPMG, who were charged with creating fraudulent tax shelters. United States v. Stein, — F.3d –, 2008 WL 3982104 (2d Cir. Aug. 28, 2008). The appeals court agreed with District Judge Lewis Kaplan that prosecutors' coercive tactics designed to induce KPMG's refusal to pay for the defendants' legal fees constituted a violation of their Sixth Amendment right to counsel. In addition, Judge Kaplan had found that some of the defendants' Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination were violated when KPMG employees were told that if they did not answer the government's questions, their employment would be terminated and/or that the firm would cease advancing legal fees to them.
The Second Circuit did not reach the Fifth Amendment question, but we do here. We conclude that Stein strengthens the argument of employees that their Fifth Amendment rights have been violated when they are coerced by their employers ' acting as agents of the government ' to cooperate with government investigations.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.