Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit decided that NBC didn't breach the employment contract of a producer for the investigative TV series “Dateline” when it fired the producer at the end of a contract cycle. Bartel v. NBC Universal Inc., 07-3913.
Veteran reporter Marsha Bartel had been hired under a four-year contract to produce a “To Catch a Predator” segment in which online predators have been lured to supposed sexual encounters with minors, only to be arrested. The arrest incidents have been filmed and aired on “Dateline.” After Bartel refused to produce the segment on the ground that it violated NBC's ethical guidelines, NBC fired her, citing budget cutbacks. (One “Predator” episode resulted in a pre-trial settlement this year of a $105 million suit against NBC by the family of a Texas prosecutor who committed suicide as he was about to be arrested on camera.)
Bartel's employment contract stated: “The term of this Agreement shall commence on December 26, 2005 and shall continue, subject to suspension, extension or termination as hereinafter provided, for a period of two hundred and eight (208) consecutive weeks thereafter. The term hereof shall be divided into four (4) consecutive cycles of fifty-two (52) weeks each. NBC shall have the right to terminate this Agreement effective at the end of any cycle prior to the last by giving Artist written notice not less than twenty-eight (28) days prior to the end of any such cycle.”
Bartel argued that the agreement was ambiguous because the words “term” and “cycle” weren't defined. But affirming the district court's dismissal of the complaint, the appeals court noted: “The 'term of this Agreement' is 208 consecutive weeks, with a specified start-point and endpoint. That period is divided into four consecutive, equal 52-week sub-intervals, each of which is referred to as a cycle. A reasonable person reading this paragraph would not be confused about the meaning of the words 'term' or 'cycle' as they are used in the agreement. A definition does not have to read 'noun X is defined as … .'”
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit decided that NBC didn't breach the employment contract of a producer for the investigative TV series “Dateline” when it fired the producer at the end of a contract cycle. Bartel v.
Veteran reporter Marsha Bartel had been hired under a four-year contract to produce a “To Catch a Predator” segment in which online predators have been lured to supposed sexual encounters with minors, only to be arrested. The arrest incidents have been filmed and aired on “Dateline.” After Bartel refused to produce the segment on the ground that it violated NBC's ethical guidelines, NBC fired her, citing budget cutbacks. (One “Predator” episode resulted in a pre-trial settlement this year of a $105 million suit against NBC by the family of a Texas prosecutor who committed suicide as he was about to be arrested on camera.)
Bartel's employment contract stated: “The term of this Agreement shall commence on December 26, 2005 and shall continue, subject to suspension, extension or termination as hereinafter provided, for a period of two hundred and eight (208) consecutive weeks thereafter. The term hereof shall be divided into four (4) consecutive cycles of fifty-two (52) weeks each. NBC shall have the right to terminate this Agreement effective at the end of any cycle prior to the last by giving Artist written notice not less than twenty-eight (28) days prior to the end of any such cycle.”
Bartel argued that the agreement was ambiguous because the words “term” and “cycle” weren't defined. But affirming the district court's dismissal of the complaint, the appeals court noted: “The 'term of this Agreement' is 208 consecutive weeks, with a specified start-point and endpoint. That period is divided into four consecutive, equal 52-week sub-intervals, each of which is referred to as a cycle. A reasonable person reading this paragraph would not be confused about the meaning of the words 'term' or 'cycle' as they are used in the agreement. A definition does not have to read 'noun X is defined as … .'”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.