Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Intellectual Property StrategistKickerFeaturesSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

The TDRA Turns Two: But Are Trademark Owners Better Off?

By Michael A. Bucci and Lex Paulson
October 28, 2008

When the Federal Trademark Dilution Act (“FTDA”) was enacted in 1996, it was expected to provide much-needed uniformity and consistency to the protection of famous marks, not to fundamentally change the traditional standard for proving trademark dilution. Under the traditional standard, as adopted in many states, a trademark owner could protect against another's use of the same or similar mark even on noncompeting goods if it could show that such use was likely to blur (or weaken) the distinctive significance of the senior user's mark.

The U.S. Supreme Court, however, saw things differently. In its 2003 decision in Moseley v. V. Secret Catalogue, 537 U.S. 418 (2003), the Court found that the FTDA's language required a showing of “actual dilution,” not “likelihood of dilution.” The Court offered little guidance on how to prove an actual lessening of a mark's distinctive significance, but a few things seemed certain: First, consumer surveys increasingly would be necessary and, more generally, it had just become considerably more difficult to prove a federal dilution claim.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.