Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The new $700 billion U.S. financial bailout bill included some tax zingers to buy off House of Representative votes. One such zinger was an extension and amendment (“the Amendment”) to Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Sec. 181, which now provides a deduction for the first $15 million of the cost of certain films produced in the U.S. This article summarizes Sec. 181, including the impact of the Amendment and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Temporary Regulations issued last year.
In summary, Sec. 181 now permits a 100% deduction (“the Film Deduction”) for the first $15 million of the cost (“Film Costs”) of certain audio-visual works (“Qualified Audio-Visual Works”) that commence principal photography in 2008 or 2009. Section 181 originally applied to Qualified Audio-Visual Works that commenced principal photography after Oct. 22, 2004, but before the Amendment, Sec. 181 was all or nothing: if the Film Costs (including residuals and participations) exceeded $15 million, you lost ' you didn't get to deduct the first $15 million. Under the Amendment, you always get to deduct the first $15 million of Film Costs, regardless of how high the budget is. Even better, the Amendment is retroactive to Qualified Audio-Visual Works that commenced principal photography after 2007.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.