Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Verdicts

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
October 29, 2008

Whistleblower Statute

Appellate panel certifies questions of state law regarding limitations, waivers and the definition of employee. Reddington v. Staten Island University Hospital, 4152-cvm, (2nd Cir., Dec. 14, 2007).

Plaintiff's suit against defendant former employer hospital alleged breach of employment contract and termination contrary to New York's whistleblower protection law. Her appeal of the district court's dismissal of her claims called for the appellate court to resolve questions under New York Labor Law 740, the state's general whistleblower protection law, and 741, a whistleblower statute enacted in 2002 providing certain protections to employees performing “health care services.” Finding unresolved determinative issues of state law, the panel certified to New York's Court of Appeals the question of whether the institution of a time-barred claim under Labor Law 740 simultaneously with a claim under 741 triggers 740(7)'s waiver provision, thereby barring the 741 claim, even if the 740 claim is later withdrawn. The panel also certified the issue of whether the definition of employee in 741 encompassed an individual like the plaintiff, who does not render medical treatment, and under what circumstances.

Whistleblower Statute

Appellate panel certifies questions of state law regarding limitations, waivers and the definition of employee. Reddington v. Staten Island University Hospital, 4152-cvm, (2nd Cir., Dec. 14, 2007).

Plaintiff's suit against defendant former employer hospital alleged breach of employment contract and termination contrary to New York's whistleblower protection law. Her appeal of the district court's dismissal of her claims called for the appellate court to resolve questions under New York Labor Law 740, the state's general whistleblower protection law, and 741, a whistleblower statute enacted in 2002 providing certain protections to employees performing “health care services.” Finding unresolved determinative issues of state law, the panel certified to New York's Court of Appeals the question of whether the institution of a time-barred claim under Labor Law 740 simultaneously with a claim under 741 triggers 740(7)'s waiver provision, thereby barring the 741 claim, even if the 740 claim is later withdrawn. The panel also certified the issue of whether the definition of employee in 741 encompassed an individual like the plaintiff, who does not render medical treatment, and under what circumstances.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?