Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Whistleblower Statute
Appellate panel certifies questions of state law regarding limitations, waivers and the definition of employee. Reddington v. Staten Island University Hospital, 4152-cvm, (2nd Cir., Dec. 14, 2007).
Plaintiff's suit against defendant former employer hospital alleged breach of employment contract and termination contrary to New York's whistleblower protection law. Her appeal of the district court's dismissal of her claims called for the appellate court to resolve questions under New York Labor Law 740, the state's general whistleblower protection law, and 741, a whistleblower statute enacted in 2002 providing certain protections to employees performing “health care services.” Finding unresolved determinative issues of state law, the panel certified to New York's Court of Appeals the question of whether the institution of a time-barred claim under Labor Law 740 simultaneously with a claim under 741 triggers 740(7)'s waiver provision, thereby barring the 741 claim, even if the 740 claim is later withdrawn. The panel also certified the issue of whether the definition of employee in 741 encompassed an individual like the plaintiff, who does not render medical treatment, and under what circumstances.
Whistleblower Statute
Appellate panel certifies questions of state law regarding limitations, waivers and the definition of employee. Reddington v. Staten Island
Plaintiff's suit against defendant former employer hospital alleged breach of employment contract and termination contrary to
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?