Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Over the years, liquidated damages clauses have continually been the subject of judicial controversy. In the franchising context, a liquidated damages clause is intended to represent an agreement between the parties as to what amount a franchisee should pay to a franchisor when the franchise agreement is terminated before its expiration, usually as a result of a breach of the agreement by the franchisee. The general rule is that payments required under liquidated damages clauses must be a reasonable approximation of the actual damages that might have been occurred, rather than a penalty.
Generally, courts have enforced liquidated damages in franchise agreements more often than not, but they have kept a close eye on these agreements, looking out for overreaching terms by the franchisor. The exact parameters as to what is unreasonable, and what is not, have been moving targets.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.