Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Marriage, Trust and Postnuptial Agreements

By Stephanie F. Lehman
October 30, 2008

Postnuptial agreements can provide solutions to complicated issues that may arise during the marriage. Consequently, there has been a reported increase in the number of postnuptial agreements being drafted by practitioners.

While postnuptial agreements are not enforceable in every state (Ohio, for example), some states place substantial limitations on the ability of a husband and wife to enter into these agreements. The following 11 states evaluate post-nuptial agreements under the same statute as pre-nuptial agreements: Alabama, Florida, Hawaii, Indiana, Kentucky, Missouri, Pennsylvania, Utah, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin. The following 15 states impose greater restrictions on post-nuptial agreements than pre-nuptial agreements: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Louisiana, Minnesota, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Wyoming and Puerto Rico. Other states impose myriad requirements on post-nuptial agreements for them to be enforceable. For example, couples in Minnesota may enter into a postnuptial agreement only if: 1) each spouse has a net worth of $1.2 million; and 2) the couple stays married for at least two years after the agreement is executed. Several states including New Jersey and Tennessee require that a post-nuptial agreement meet standards of substantive fairness both at the time it is signed and at the time it is ultimately enforced. With regard to post-nuptial agreements, California imposes a rebuttable presumption of coercion. (Citations to the relevant statutory and case law are available upon request to the editor.)

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.