Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It is one of the fundamental tenets of bankruptcy law that a sale order will not be disturbed on appeal if no stay pending appeal is obtained so long as the purchaser is a good-faith purchaser. The Ninth Circuit BAP's recent opinion in Clear Channel v. Knupfer, 391 B.R. 25 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2008), threatens the sanctity of the mootness rule under Bankruptcy Code ' 363(m). In Clear Channel, the BAP held that ' 363(m) applies only to protect the portion of sale orders issued under ' 363(b) or (c), but not to the “free and clear” relief under ' 363(f). In reaching its conclusion, the BAP made two primary arguments: 1) on its face, ' 363(m) only applies to sales of property under ' 363(b) or (c); and 2) ' 363(m) only protects the “validity of the sale” and not the “free-and-clear” relief under ' 363(f), which it deemed merely a term of the sale.
Was the BAP's 'Plain' Reading of ' 363(m) Correct?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.