Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Surprisingly few reported decisions discuss whether criminal investigations of corporate wrongdoing are covered under directors' and officers' liability (“D&O“) insurance policies. This is amazing because the past decade has been marked by waves of corporate scandals, and federal and state prosecutors and regulators will likely continue to launch broad investigations of corporate conduct in the decade to come. Meanwhile, the costs and risks of defending against these investigations are growing.
A criminal indictment can spell disaster, if not death, for a corporation. The most infamous example of this was Arthur Andersen LLP's indictment and conviction in 2002 for obstructing justice ' a conviction that was overturned by the Supreme Court three years after the accounting giant collapsed. Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, 544 U.S. 696, 708 (2005). Despite the perceived or actual pro-corporate bent of the Bush Administration, federal prosecutors have resorted to aggressive enforcement tactics, prompting corporations anxious to avoid Arthur Andersen's fate to engage in unprecedented cooperation with the government. For example, federal prosecutors have successfully pressured corporations to refuse indemnification to corporate officers, to refrain from entering into joint defense agreements with their employees or others under investigation, and to waive the benefits of the corporation's attorney-client privilege.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.