Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Surprisingly few reported decisions discuss whether criminal investigations of corporate wrongdoing are covered under directors' and officers' liability (“D&O“) insurance policies. This is amazing because the past decade has been marked by waves of corporate scandals, and federal and state prosecutors and regulators will likely continue to launch broad investigations of corporate conduct in the decade to come. Meanwhile, the costs and risks of defending against these investigations are growing.
A criminal indictment can spell disaster, if not death, for a corporation. The most infamous example of this was Arthur Andersen LLP's indictment and conviction in 2002 for obstructing justice ' a conviction that was overturned by the Supreme Court three years after the accounting giant collapsed. Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, 544 U.S. 696, 708 (2005). Despite the perceived or actual pro-corporate bent of the Bush Administration, federal prosecutors have resorted to aggressive enforcement tactics, prompting corporations anxious to avoid Arthur Andersen's fate to engage in unprecedented cooperation with the government. For example, federal prosecutors have successfully pressured corporations to refuse indemnification to corporate officers, to refrain from entering into joint defense agreements with their employees or others under investigation, and to waive the benefits of the corporation's attorney-client privilege.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.