Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The definitive case of Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC, 229 F.R.D. 422 (S.D.N.Y. 2004), involving claims for gender discrimination and retaliation by a female employee, should be of concern to law firms and their clients regarding their duties to preserve evidence and in particular the duty of lawyers to supervise clients in producing discovery responses.
Since an employment discrimination or employment claim-related case will generally involve primarily internal company or firm documents, especially e-mails, the duty of firm attorneys where a firm is the defendant and the duty of counsel to supervise firm clients is especially heightened in the employment litigation context. However, while the Zubulake case arose in the employment context, the principles espoused therein have a broad application to any law firm or lawyer supervising clients in the litigation context.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.