Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana granted a defendant's motion to transfer to New York federal court a suit over the alleged unauthorized use of the names and likenesses of legendary baseball players, including Lou Gehrig, Thurman Munson and Jackie Robinson. CMG Worldwide Inc. v. The Upper Deck Co. Inc., 1:08-cv-761-RLY-JMS.
In 2007, CMG, an Indiana-based celebrity licensing agency, and Upper Deck, with offices in California and New Jersey, entered into short-term, non-exclusive agreements for trading card goods. The agreements included an Indiana forum selection clause. In 2008, CMG entered into an exclusive agreement for the rights to the same baseball players with the New York-based Topps Co. CMG and Topps then sued in Indiana federal court, alleging that Upper Deck had released trading card products after its agreements with CMG expired.
In granting Upper Deck's motion to transfer the case to the Southern District of New York, the Indiana district court noted: “Both Upper Deck and Topps have offices either in or near the Southern District of New York. Although CMG does not have an office in New York, CMG engages in business throughout the world.”
The court continued: “Although CMG makes reference to the expired Permission Agreements [with the Indiana forum selection clause], CMG does not explain in the Amended Complaint nor in its filings how the expired Permission Agreements play a role in this case.
“Indiana has little or no connection with the controversy at issue. CMG, the only party connection to Indiana, is merely acting as an agent for the estates of these players, so its location is not material. In addition, no Indiana property rights are implicated by this case as Topps has not established that any of the Legends were domiciled in Indiana at the time of each of their respective deaths. New York, on the other hand, was the domicile of two of the players in question (Lou Gehrig and Christy Mathewson) at the time of their deaths, so New York law applies to any publicity rights that CMG allegedly holds and allegedly transferred to Topps with respect to these former players.”
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana granted a defendant's motion to transfer to
In 2007, CMG, an Indiana-based celebrity licensing agency, and Upper Deck, with offices in California and New Jersey, entered into short-term, non-exclusive agreements for trading card goods. The agreements included an Indiana forum selection clause. In 2008, CMG entered into an exclusive agreement for the rights to the same baseball players with the New York-based Topps Co. CMG and Topps then sued in Indiana federal court, alleging that Upper Deck had released trading card products after its agreements with CMG expired.
In granting Upper Deck's motion to transfer the case to the Southern District of
The court continued: “Although CMG makes reference to the expired Permission Agreements [with the Indiana forum selection clause], CMG does not explain in the Amended Complaint nor in its filings how the expired Permission Agreements play a role in this case.
“Indiana has little or no connection with the controversy at issue. CMG, the only party connection to Indiana, is merely acting as an agent for the estates of these players, so its location is not material. In addition, no Indiana property rights are implicated by this case as Topps has not established that any of the Legends were domiciled in Indiana at the time of each of their respective deaths.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.