Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Workplace embezzlement is an increasingly common occurrence: According to the most recent U.S. Department of Justice Statistics, embezzlement increased by 39% between 1990 and 2000. In the current economic environment, this trend will likely accelerate. But despite its frequency, embezzlement, when uncovered, still engenders feelings of rage, betrayal and embarrassment. Before the emotional reaction subsides, companies generally take immediate, reflexively punitive steps against the employee-suspect: on-the-spot termination, hasty escort from the premises, restricted access to the company's electronic network, and prompt notification of local law enforcement. While these steps may assuage the emotional wounds inflicted by the theft, a different approach may better serve a company's long-term financial interests. If a company's primary objective is asset recovery, that company should not rush to carry out the procedures enumerated above in response to a presumed embezzlement.
This admonition may seem counter-intuitive. Why not immediately call law enforcement when an employee has looted a corporate bank account? Doesn't one usually call the police if a home is burglarized or a car stolen? And why not immediately terminate a disloyal employee?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.