Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
These days, it has become very common for retail landlords to charge retail tenants “pass through” costs such as operating expenses, insurance costs, taxes, and marketing costs on a fixed cost basis with mandatory fixed increases as opposed to charging tenants a proportionate share of the actual amounts for these charges. The advantage for the landlord to provide these costs on a fixed basis with fixed increases (“Fixed Costs”) is to reduce costs for accounting, reduce or eliminate tenant audit rights, and perhaps be able to make a profit, if the Fixed Costs exceed the actual costs incurred by the landlord for these expenses. The advantages to the tenant for paying these Fixed Costs (instead of a proportionate share of these expenses) is that it allows the tenant to budget for these costs with an absolute certainty as to what these costs will be in the future; it reduces accounting and audit costs, and protects the tenant in the event certain “uncontrollable costs” (e.g., taxes, energy costs, etc.) greatly increase in the future, since this risk has now been assumed by the landlord.
However, there are certain issues that a tenant should consider before agreeing to switch from paying these “pass through” expenses on a proportionate share basis to paying for these expenses as part of Fixed Costs. Among those issues that should be considered by the tenant are what expenses should be included in Fixed Costs, what expenses are excluded from Fixed Costs and how the Fixed Costs will be escalated over time.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.