Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
These days, it has become very common for retail landlords to charge retail tenants “pass through” costs such as operating expenses, insurance costs, taxes, and marketing costs on a fixed cost basis with mandatory fixed increases as opposed to charging tenants a proportionate share of the actual amounts for these charges. The advantage for the landlord to provide these costs on a fixed basis with fixed increases (“Fixed Costs”) is to reduce costs for accounting, reduce or eliminate tenant audit rights, and perhaps be able to make a profit, if the Fixed Costs exceed the actual costs incurred by the landlord for these expenses. The advantages to the tenant for paying these Fixed Costs (instead of a proportionate share of these expenses) is that it allows the tenant to budget for these costs with an absolute certainty as to what these costs will be in the future; it reduces accounting and audit costs, and protects the tenant in the event certain “uncontrollable costs” (e.g., taxes, energy costs, etc.) greatly increase in the future, since this risk has now been assumed by the landlord.
However, there are certain issues that a tenant should consider before agreeing to switch from paying these “pass through” expenses on a proportionate share basis to paying for these expenses as part of Fixed Costs. Among those issues that should be considered by the tenant are what expenses should be included in Fixed Costs, what expenses are excluded from Fixed Costs and how the Fixed Costs will be escalated over time.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."