Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Premises Liabiity
Owner had no duty to warn of icy conditions. Wolfley v. Solectron USA, Inc., No. 07-3629 (8th Cir. 9/8/2008).
Under North Carolina law, a facility owner was not required to warn a deliveryman of a significant ice and water accumulation in a parking lot that created an open and obvious dangerous condition. The facility was closed the day before the deliveryman's accident in the parking lot due to the weather. Also, the deliveryman's truck slid on ice while entering and inside the lot. The deliveryman walked cautiously around the truck because the lot was icy, and noticed water draining across the path, as well as ice on the path, where he slipped and fell.
Premises Liabiity
Owner had no duty to warn of icy conditions. Wolfley v. Solectron USA, Inc., No. 07-3629 (8th Cir. 9/8/2008).
Under North Carolina law, a facility owner was not required to warn a deliveryman of a significant ice and water accumulation in a parking lot that created an open and obvious dangerous condition. The facility was closed the day before the deliveryman's accident in the parking lot due to the weather. Also, the deliveryman's truck slid on ice while entering and inside the lot. The deliveryman walked cautiously around the truck because the lot was icy, and noticed water draining across the path, as well as ice on the path, where he slipped and fell.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.