Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided that The Rolling Stones' tour management company didn't breach the exclusivity terms of an agreement for use of Stones intellectual properties in conjunction with the planned development of a limited-edition Blackberry smartphone. RST (2005) Inc. v. Research in Motion Ltd. (RIM), 07 CV 3737(VM).
RST was formed to manage The Rolling Stones' 2005-2007 “A Bigger Bang” tour. RST entered into an agreement in October 2005 to exclusively license to RIM intellectual properties of The Stones ' including trademarks, logos, photos and video clips ' to develop a limited-edition Blackberry. The agreement promised RST a $1 million licensing fee, and that RIM would invest $5 million in developing and promoting the smartphone, or pay RST the difference if less than $5 million was spent. However, in September 2005, Virgin Records, for which The Stones recorded, had struck a deal with SanDisk for use of some of the same Stones intellectual properties to promote a “Gruvi” flash memory card. When Palm used these Stones intellectual properties to advertise an offer of a free Gruvi card with the purchase of a Palm handheld device, RIM informed RST that their agreement was terminated and refused to develop the limited-edition Blackberry.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.