Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Verdicts
One-Time Stock Award Was a Gift Not Subject to Mandatory Bargaining
Unite Here v. National Labor Relations Board, 06-4440-ag, 2nd Cir., Oct. 14, 2008.
A labor union sought review of the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) finding that a one-time stock award, given in equal shares to all company employees after an initial public stock offering, was a gift not subject to mandatory bargaining. Denying review, the appellate panel found that the NLRB's determination was not arbitrary and was supported by substantial evidence. Thus the panel, discussing NLRB v. Niles-Bement-Pond Co., held that the stock award was not a unilateral increase in wages, or an alteration of the terms and conditions of employment such that, absent bargaining, it violated ” 8(a)(1) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act. Discussing Benchmark Indus. and Phelps Dodge Mining Co. v. NLRB, the panel rejected the union's argument that the determination of whether an award or bonus is subject to bargaining depended on whether the award was of “token value.” The panel also noted that nothing in the NLRB's test limited non-bargainable gifts to gifts given during a particular holiday or season.
One-Time Stock Award Was a Gift Not Subject to Mandatory Bargaining
Unite Here v. National Labor Relations Board, 06-4440-ag, 2nd Cir., Oct. 14, 2008.
A labor union sought review of the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) finding that a one-time stock award, given in equal shares to all company employees after an initial public stock offering, was a gift not subject to mandatory bargaining. Denying review, the appellate panel found that the NLRB's determination was not arbitrary and was supported by substantial evidence. Thus the panel, discussing NLRB v. Niles-Bement-Pond Co., held that the stock award was not a unilateral increase in wages, or an alteration of the terms and conditions of employment such that, absent bargaining, it violated ” 8(a)(1) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act. Discussing Benchmark Indus. and Phelps Dodge Mining Co. v. NLRB, the panel rejected the union's argument that the determination of whether an award or bonus is subject to bargaining depended on whether the award was of “token value.” The panel also noted that nothing in the NLRB's test limited non-bargainable gifts to gifts given during a particular holiday or season.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?