Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Current Issues in Syndicated Lending: Defaulting Lenders and the Failure to Fund

By David L. Batty
January 29, 2009

The adverse impact of the current market disruption on many financial institutions has given rise to an increased risk of the occurrence of lenders defaulting on lending obligations. This, in turn, has placed unexpected focus both on the effectiveness of defaulting lender provisions and certain other funding and management mechanics of many syndicated credit agreements. In particular, the typical remedy that allows the borrower to replace a defaulting lender at par has proven to be inadequate due to the current lack of liquidity in the market and the trading levels of most syndicated loans at well below par.

Most current syndicated credit agreements include a concept of a defaulting lender to address situations where a lender fails to fund its pro rata share of an advance, reimbursement, or participation under a syndicated credit agreement (any such lender, a “Defaulting Lender”). For example, the Model Credit Agreement Provisions (Effective May 2005, the “Model Provisions”) for syndicated credit agreements published by the Loan Syndications and Trading Association expressly give a borrower the right to require any Defaulting Lender “to assign and delegate, without recourse (in accordance with and subject to the [applicable assignment terms and conditions], all of its interests, rights and obligations under this Agreement and the related Loan Documents ' to an assignee” at par. (See, Model Provisions, Yield Protection, Section 3(b) Mitigation of Obligations; Replacement of Lenders) Notably, the Model Provisions do not include a formal definition of “Defaulting Lender,” and except as described above, the Model Provisions do not address Defaulting Lender issues. Unlike the Model Provisions, most syndicated credit agreements do include a formal definition of “Defaulting Lender,” and this definition frequently includes any Lender that is deemed insolvent or is in receivership within the definition. As evidenced by the Model Provisions, defaulting lender terms were typically drafted with the expectation that a Defaulting Lender would be a rare and isolated occurrence, and could be readily replaced by an assignment at par.

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.