Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Current Issues in Syndicated Lending: Defaulting Lenders and the Failure to Fund

By David L. Batty
January 29, 2009

The adverse impact of the current market disruption on many financial institutions has given rise to an increased risk of the occurrence of lenders defaulting on lending obligations. This, in turn, has placed unexpected focus both on the effectiveness of defaulting lender provisions and certain other funding and management mechanics of many syndicated credit agreements. In particular, the typical remedy that allows the borrower to replace a defaulting lender at par has proven to be inadequate due to the current lack of liquidity in the market and the trading levels of most syndicated loans at well below par.

Most current syndicated credit agreements include a concept of a defaulting lender to address situations where a lender fails to fund its pro rata share of an advance, reimbursement, or participation under a syndicated credit agreement (any such lender, a “Defaulting Lender”). For example, the Model Credit Agreement Provisions (Effective May 2005, the “Model Provisions”) for syndicated credit agreements published by the Loan Syndications and Trading Association expressly give a borrower the right to require any Defaulting Lender “to assign and delegate, without recourse (in accordance with and subject to the [applicable assignment terms and conditions], all of its interests, rights and obligations under this Agreement and the related Loan Documents ' to an assignee” at par. (See, Model Provisions, Yield Protection, Section 3(b) Mitigation of Obligations; Replacement of Lenders) Notably, the Model Provisions do not include a formal definition of “Defaulting Lender,” and except as described above, the Model Provisions do not address Defaulting Lender issues. Unlike the Model Provisions, most syndicated credit agreements do include a formal definition of “Defaulting Lender,” and this definition frequently includes any Lender that is deemed insolvent or is in receivership within the definition. As evidenced by the Model Provisions, defaulting lender terms were typically drafted with the expectation that a Defaulting Lender would be a rare and isolated occurrence, and could be readily replaced by an assignment at par.

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.