Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Looper Reed & McGraw (Houston): Joel C. Thompson joins the firm's general civil litigation, commercial litigation and class action practice groups as partner in the Houston office. Thompson will focus on products liability, wrongful death, insurance litigation, negligent security litigation, premises liability and construction litigation. Previously, Thompson was an attorney in his own private practice.
Akerman Senterfitt (Miami): J. Everett Wilson and Michael Gennett join the firm's health care practice as partner and of counsel, respectively, in the Miami office. Wilson will focus on licensing and reimbursement disputes and negotiated managed care. Gennett will focus on representing health-care practitioners and institutional providers. Previously, Wilson and Gennett were members of the health law practice group at Shutts & Bowen, which was chaired by Wilson.
Drinker Biddle & Reath (Philadelphia): George H. Kendall and Audrey A. Hale join the firm's health law practice group as partners in the Florham Park, NJ, office. Kendall and Hale will focus on mergers, acquisitions and joint ventures. Previously, Kendall and Hale were partners at McCarter & English of Newark, NJ.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold (San Francisco): Linda A. Willett has been promoted to head of the firm's drug and medical device practice group. Willett joined the firm in July and previously was vice president and deputy general counsel at Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
Eckert Seamans Cherin and Mellott (Charleston, WV): The Pittsburgh-based firm of Eckert Seamans Cherin and Mellott has merged with the 12-attorney firm of Hendrickson & Long of Charleston, WV. Among the 12 attorneys to join the firm are Hendrickson & Long's named partners, David Hendrickson and R. Scott Long. Hendrickson has more than 25 years of trial experience and focuses his practice on products liability, toxic torts, medical malpractice, insurance defense and general business litigation. Long concentrates his practice on products liability, personal injury, medical malpractice, toxic tort and asbestos defense. The new office of Eckert Seamans will remain at the same location where Hendrickson & Long was based.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?