Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The global credit crisis has already spawned numerous investigations seeking to determine whether wrongdoing at financial institutions caused any part of the financial meltdown. The press has reported ongoing investigations by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the SEC of many of the most recognizable names in the financial world, including Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Credit Suisse, UBS, AIG, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. With the public furious over corporate excesses, the Obama Administration is likely to devote significant enforcement resources to ensuring that none of the federal bailout money is used improperly. Task forces will be formed. More civil cases will be filed. The pressure on financial institutions from government regulators is certain to be intense.
In this heightened enforcement environment, it is more important than ever that corporate general counsel be ready and able to navigate a minefield of complex issues as soon as they become aware that their company is the focus of a government investigation. Upon learning of a subpoena for corporate records, counsel must quickly assemble the correct team, analyze the subpoena, and determine who may have responsive documents. Given the stress of this process, companies should strive to have proper controls in place well before becoming the target of an investigation. Regardless, counsel must be extremely organized from the beginning and must work effectively with both the business units and the IT department to establish an infrastructure which assures that everyone is working from the same playbook. At best, early mistakes will cause later headaches; at worst, they can be devastating.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.