Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Film Rights/No Double Recovery Allowed
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed that a film investor who was awarded damages for breach of contract over the film director's activities in promoting the movie, wasn't also entitled to a declaration of ownership of the movie's distribution and promotion rights. Berman v. Flynn, 07-2154. Richard Berman had provided funding for the documentary film Your Mommy Kills Animals. Maura Flynn wrote the treatment. Berman and Flynn later sued director Curt Johnson for making significant changes to the treatment and over Johnson's “promot[ing] the film via the Internet, interviews, screenings, and by engaging a distribution consultant.” A jury awarded Berman $370,000 on the breach of contract claim. (Berman had invested $310,000 in the movie in return for a promised $60,000 in profit.) The district judge then ruled that Flynn was a co-author of the movie with Johnson but denied Berman's request for a declaration that Berman owned the distribution and promotion rights. The Fourth Circuit noted in its unpublished opinion: “We agree with the district court that the jury, in finding a breach of contract and awarding damages, compensated Berman for all losses flowing from the breach. A declaration granting Berman the promotion and distribution rights, which had already been taken into account in the jury's damages award to him, would therefore amount to a double recovery.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.