Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Over the last five years, companies and counsel have been sensitized to the dangers of mishandling the duty to preserve documents, and particularly electronic documents, relevant to pending or reasonably anticipated litigation. Examples abound of penalties assessed ' whether monetary or evidentiary ' for failures to impose, monitor and enforce appropriate litigation holds. However, far less attention has been paid to the other half of the equation, the appropriate lifting of an existing litigation hold. To date, no case involving the lifting of a litigation hold has reached the appellate level; a few trial court decisions treat the subject tangentially. Though the topic gets a passing mention in legal periodicals from time to time, it is generally assumed that lifting a hold is a straightforward technical process. That assumption can be dangerously wrong.
Lifting a litigation hold requires legal analysis at least as substantial as the imposition of such a hold in the first place. Given that the end of a litigation is often characterized by multiple antagonisms, tense negotiations, the potential for third-party recrimination, and hostile miscommunication, lifting a hold on discoverable documents may actually be even more perilous and complex than imposing one. This article explores some of the legal and practical considerations that go into lifting a litigation hold, while minimizing the risk of the activity.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.