Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Practice Tip: The Fine Art of Safely Lifting Litigation Holds

By Sarah L. Olson
March 30, 2009

Over the last five years, companies and counsel have been sensitized to the dangers of mishandling the duty to preserve documents, and particularly electronic documents, relevant to pending or reasonably anticipated litigation. Examples abound of penalties assessed ' whether monetary or evidentiary ' for failures to impose, monitor and enforce appropriate litigation holds. However, far less attention has been paid to the other half of the equation, the appropriate lifting of an existing litigation hold. To date, no case involving the lifting of a litigation hold has reached the appellate level; a few trial court decisions treat the subject tangentially. Though the topic gets a passing mention in legal periodicals from time to time, it is generally assumed that lifting a hold is a straightforward technical process. That assumption can be dangerously wrong.

Lifting a litigation hold requires legal analysis at least as substantial as the imposition of such a hold in the first place. Given that the end of a litigation is often characterized by multiple antagonisms, tense negotiations, the potential for third-party recrimination, and hostile miscommunication, lifting a hold on discoverable documents may actually be even more perilous and complex than imposing one. This article explores some of the legal and practical considerations that go into lifting a litigation hold, while minimizing the risk of the activity.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The Bankruptcy Hotline Image

Recent cases of importance to your practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

How AI Has Affected PR Image

When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.