Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Feb. 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA” or the “Act”). The Act creates new obligations for employers under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986 (“COBRA”). Under COBRA, employers must provide covered individuals who participate in group health plans the opportunity to elect to continue group health plan coverage if such coverage is lost due to termination of employment or another qualifying event. Generally, such coverage must be offered to covered individuals for a period of up to 18 months at no more than 102% of the cost of health care coverage (the total cost of continued health care coverage) plus a 2% administrative fee.
Under ARRA, certain individuals will now be eligible for a subsidy from the federal government for up to 65% of the cost of their COBRA premiums. In light of the current economic downturn, the COBRA subsidy is an attempt by the Obama administration to provide more affordable health insurance to certain individuals who have involuntarily lost their jobs. The subsidy is a temporary measure, and it applies only to individuals who have been involuntarily terminated. The subsidy is not available to individuals who retire, otherwise voluntarily leave their employment, or become eligible for COBRA continuation coverage because of a reduction in hours that is not a termination of employment.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.