Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy StrategistLJN NewslettersNewsSections

Trustee Liability and the Curious Case of Maxwell v. KPMG, LLP

By Peter J. Roberts and Gordon E. Gouveia
April 24, 2009

Last year, Judge Richard A. Posner of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals wrote an opinion that sent shockwaves throughout the bankruptcy community, particularly in trustee circles. The shocking part of Maxwell v. KPMG, LLP, 520 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2008) (“Maxwell I“) was not its holding, but its dicta. In affirming the dismissal of a bankruptcy trustee's $600 million accounting malpractice case, the Seventh Circuit admonished bankruptcy judges to “be vigilant in policing the litigation judgment exercised by trustees in bankruptcy,” and it also suggested the imposition of personal sanctions against trustees who file frivolous lawsuits. See Maxwell I, 520 F.3d at 718-719.

Some commentators have applauded Maxwell I as just deserts for a bankruptcy trustee who brought suit based on overly aggressive theories of liability and damages. Others have been troubled by the Seventh Circuit's criticism of bankruptcy trustees and its unsupported suggestion of personal sanctions against plaintiff trustees. However, almost all commentators have correctly regarded Maxwell I as a cautionary tale for any trustee embarking upon an aggressive litigation strategy.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.