Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Product Liability Law & StrategyKickerFeaturesTopicsRegulationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

The New Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act

By Mark R. Kaster and Nena F. Street
April 27, 2009

The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (commonly referred to as the “CPSIA”) was enacted in August 2008 in the wake of a sharp increase in recalls of children's products, particularly the recall of toys during and after the 2007 holiday season. This article provides an overview of the CPSIA, including a summary of key provisions, an update on agency rulemaking to implement the law, and an assessment of the risks and challenges related to compliance with the law.

The CPSIA instituted significant new regulatory requirements applicable not only to toys and consumer products marketed to children, but to all consumer products that are regulated by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (the “CPSC”). Key components of the CPSIA include:

  • Reduced lead content limit for children's products;
  • Compliance certification requirements for all consumer products that are regulated in any manner under U.S. consumer product safety laws;
  • Mandatory third-party testing and certification for all children's products;
  • A ban on certain phthalates in children's toys and child care articles;
  • Permanent tracking label requirements for all children's products;
  • Warning requirements for certain children's product advertisements; and
  • New whistleblower protections and enhanced enforcement.

The CPSIA applies most significantly to all manufacturers and importers of products regulated under U.S. consumer product safety laws, including products regulated under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (“FHSA”); Flammable Fabrics Act (“FFA”); Poison Packaging Prevention Act (“PPA”); and Refrigerator Safety Act (“RFA”).

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.