Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Injunctions play a key role in franchising. They enable franchisors to enforce in-term and post-term covenants contained in their franchising agreements to protect their brand, reputation, and franchise system generally. They also allow franchisees to enjoin franchisors from wrongfully terminating their franchise relationship.
When pending a trial wherein a franchisor seeks to enjoin a franchisee from breaching a restrictive covenant or a franchisee seeks to enjoin a franchisor from terminating their relationship, Canadian courts have generally applied the following three-part test (the “Test”): 1) Is there a serious issue to be tried?; 2) Will the moving party suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted?; and 3) Does the balance of convenience lie in favor of granting the injunction? (The quintessential test for an interlocutory injunction is set out in R.J.R MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (A.G.), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 31 at pp. 334-343.) Where the facts satisfy the Test, Canadian courts have typically granted an injunction without paying too much attention to the merits.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.