Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Court Watch

By Cynthia M. Klaus and Meredith A. Bauer
May 28, 2009

Hall Street Reasoning Interpreted By Missouri District Court

Since the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Hall Street Associates, LLC v. Matel, Inc., 128 S. Ct. 1396 (2008), involving the question of whether an arbitration award may be vacated or modified due to a “manifest disregard for the law,” courts and counsel have struggled to interpret the decision and determine the appropriate circumstances in which judicial review of an arbitration award should be employed. In Hall Street, the Supreme Court found that ” 10 and 11 of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) offer the exclusive bases for judicial review of an arbitration award.

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.