Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Contextual advertising ' advertising placed where it will be seen by consumers looking for competitors' products ' is everywhere:
Contextual advertising is particularly significant on the Internet because the ability to display advertisements or Web-site links when consumers search for particular terms gives advertisers a powerful tool for targeting consumers, and provides a critical source of revenue for Internet search engines.
While contextual advertising is well accepted in bricks-and-mortar businesses and in traditional publications, it is controversial on the Internet. Courts have not worked out whether (and if so, how) an advertiser may use a competitor's trademark to trigger banner ads or sponsored links displayed along with search results. A recent U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decision, Rescuecom Corp. v. Google Inc., 562 F.3d 123 (2d Cir. 2009), confirms a trend favoring trademark holders at the expense of maximally effective contextual advertising. Rescuecom held that Google's practice of selling trademarked terms as keywords to trigger advertising accompanying search results is a “use in commerce” of the trademarks ' a necessary element of a claim under the Lanham Act (“the Act”) ' even though the trademarks themselves do not appear in the advertising consumers see.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.