Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bit Parts

Concert Financing/Loan Guaranty

The California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, decided that a guarantor for a loan to help finance a Great Wall of China rock concert was obligated to repay the financier who made the loan. Stewart v. Joyce & Associates Inc., G039871. Plaintiff John Stewart had loaned promoter Doc Brown Productions $250,000. Stewart later obtained a default judgment against Doc Brown, but the lower court ruled for loan guarantor Joyce & Associates on the ground that the concert hadn't earned any gross revenue. Reversing and remanding, the court of appeal noted in an unpublished opinion: “While Stewart failed to provide any evidence with regard to the amounts of money, if any, generated from DVD or pay-per-view sales [of the China concert], he provided evidence to show that the filmed footage of the concert and all of its sound recordings were sold for $1,964,117.80. This one sale alone was enough to demonstrate that the concert had generated 'gross revenue' within the meaning of the financier agreement. ' Here, Doc Brown sold what would appear to have been all of the concert-related assets in exchange for substantial consideration-or revenue-to the tune of $1,964,117.80. It would appear to have retained no concert-related assets that had the capacity to generate any other revenue later on. Joyce would have us believe that once Doc Brown so disposed of all the revenue-generating assets, by the simple expedient of accepting [an unsecured promissory] note instead of cash, Stewart never needed to be paid back. Not so fast.”

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.