Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, affirmed an order to compel the production of documents from trademark lawyers for John Malm, former manager of musician Trent Reznor, for use in litigation between Malm and his counsel from an earlier suit that Reznor had filed against Malm. Meyers, Roman, Friedberg & Lewis (MRFL) v. Malm, 90949. MRFL served as counsel to Malm in a case before Judge Jed Rakoff in the Southern District of New York in which Reznor alleged Malm mishandled the artist's money and ownership of the trademark to Reznor's band, Nine Inch Nails. A federal jury awarded $5 million to Reznor in 2005.
MRFL soon sued Malm for legal fees and Malm countered with a legal malpractice claim against MRFL, which subpoenaed Malm's trademark lawyers, Fay Sharpe, for “[a]ny and all communications of any kind between Federal District Judge Jed Rakoff and [Fay Sharpe attorneys], or anyone at the law firm of Fay, Sharpe, Fagan, Minnich & McKee (or any former name or current name of such law firm) during the year 2005.” Citing attorney-client privilege, Malm told Fay Sharpe to not turn over the documents. MRFL then filed its motion to compel. In granting the motion, the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County decided that Malm had voluntarily waived the attorney-client privilege during the Reznor litigation.
Ohio's attorney-client privilege rule appears in Revised Code '2317.02, which acknowledges that “if the client voluntarily testifies [on a privileged matter] ' the attorney may be compelled to testify on the same subject.” During the Reznor-Malm litigation, Malm had given testimony in court that conflicted with a statement in his deposition as to whether he tried to obtain a 100% interest in the “Nine Inch Nails” trademark from Reznor.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.