Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

New Lawyers for MTV in Dispute with Pearlman

By Brian Baxter
July 23, 2009

The tangled bankruptcy mess created by former boy band impresario Lou Pearlman, currently in prison after admitting he ran a $300 million Ponzi scheme, has left a trail of out-of-pocket investors looking to recoup their losses.

In August 2008 the trustee in Pearlman's ongoing Chapter 11 case, Soneet Kapila of Miami, sued MTV Networks in U.S. bankruptcy court in Orlando over the music channel's role in a joint venture with Pearlman's television production company, Trans Continental, to create the popular TV series Making the Band.

In July, MTV canned its litigation counsel at K&L Gates in favor of new counsel at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and Holland & Knight.

A three-page substitution of counsel order filed with the bankruptcy court stated that K&L Gates partner Carol Lumpkin and associate Annie Zaffuto have withdrawn from the case and been replaced by Paul Weiss litigation partners Andrew Ehrlich and Leslie Fagen and bankruptcy partner Stephen Shimshak. (MTV's parent
Viacom is a longtime Paul Weiss client; Holland & Knight bankruptcy partner Brian McDowell in Orlando is serving as local counsel.)

The two firms will face off against Kapila's counsel from Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman. The latter signed on to handle litigation for the trustee when the firm opened a Miami office in April by acquiring Silverman Cosgrove & Sammataro, a boutique litigation firm founded by three former Akerman Senterfitt partners.

Kasowitz Benson partner James Sammataro ' who brought the Making the Band litigation with him from his old firm ' said in a statement to The Am Law Daily, an affiliate of Entertainment Law & Finance, that the case is important to those victimized by Pearlman's Ponzi scheme.

“[Making the Band] involves iconic figures in the entertainment industry, and a show that has spawned multiple platinum selling musical acts,” Sammataro said. “It is the cornerstone of MTV's television programming, as evidenced by its 10-year run. We believe the Making the Band franchise must be sold, and expect that it will command a significant sum in the open market.”

Making the Band first aired on ABC in 1999 and featured the boy band O-Town. At the first season's conclusion, the new group signed with Pearlman's record label, Trans Continental Records. (Having spawned acts like the Backstreet Boys and *NSYNC, Pearlman was an ideal partner during the boy band craze; the disgraced talent manager is managing a new group, Biteboy, from his jail cell.)

But as the popularity of the boy bands gradually began to wane, plaintiffs claim that MTV dumped Pearlman to create Making the Band 2 with P. Diddy, seeking to infuse the show with new blood and cater to a hip-hop/R&B audience.

According to their 66-page complaint, Trans Continental and Kapila claim that Pearlman's production company was slowly squeezed out of the joint venture as MTV reneged on promises to share profits from advertising revenue, spin-offs and other related projects.

MTV maintains the joint venture contract states that Trans Continental's interests were extinguished when the Making the Band 2 franchise began airing in 2002 on MTV with P. Diddy as the centerpiece instead of O-Town. (O-Town broke up in late 2003.)

The case was scheduled to go to mediation in July, with both sides agreeing on Miami entertainment lawyer Leslie Zigel, a former Greenberg Traurig partner and vice president of business and legal affairs at BMG, serving as mediator. But the change in outside counsel by MTV would likely delay that scenario.

Sources say that MTV was upset with the level of court activity in the case and that depositions haven't gone well for MTV in the early going. (Some of those depos could eventually include P. Diddy himself, who if the case goes to trial, will likely be a witness.)


Brian Baxter is a Staff Reporter for American Lawyer, a sibling publication of Entertainment Law & Finance.

The tangled bankruptcy mess created by former boy band impresario Lou Pearlman, currently in prison after admitting he ran a $300 million Ponzi scheme, has left a trail of out-of-pocket investors looking to recoup their losses.

In August 2008 the trustee in Pearlman's ongoing Chapter 11 case, Soneet Kapila of Miami, sued MTV Networks in U.S. bankruptcy court in Orlando over the music channel's role in a joint venture with Pearlman's television production company, Trans Continental, to create the popular TV series Making the Band.

In July, MTV canned its litigation counsel at K&L Gates in favor of new counsel at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and Holland & Knight.

A three-page substitution of counsel order filed with the bankruptcy court stated that K&L Gates partner Carol Lumpkin and associate Annie Zaffuto have withdrawn from the case and been replaced by Paul Weiss litigation partners Andrew Ehrlich and Leslie Fagen and bankruptcy partner Stephen Shimshak. (MTV's parent
Viacom is a longtime Paul Weiss client; Holland & Knight bankruptcy partner Brian McDowell in Orlando is serving as local counsel.)

The two firms will face off against Kapila's counsel from Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman. The latter signed on to handle litigation for the trustee when the firm opened a Miami office in April by acquiring Silverman Cosgrove & Sammataro, a boutique litigation firm founded by three former Akerman Senterfitt partners.

Kasowitz Benson partner James Sammataro ' who brought the Making the Band litigation with him from his old firm ' said in a statement to The Am Law Daily, an affiliate of Entertainment Law & Finance, that the case is important to those victimized by Pearlman's Ponzi scheme.

“[Making the Band] involves iconic figures in the entertainment industry, and a show that has spawned multiple platinum selling musical acts,” Sammataro said. “It is the cornerstone of MTV's television programming, as evidenced by its 10-year run. We believe the Making the Band franchise must be sold, and expect that it will command a significant sum in the open market.”

Making the Band first aired on ABC in 1999 and featured the boy band O-Town. At the first season's conclusion, the new group signed with Pearlman's record label, Trans Continental Records. (Having spawned acts like the Backstreet Boys and *NSYNC, Pearlman was an ideal partner during the boy band craze; the disgraced talent manager is managing a new group, Biteboy, from his jail cell.)

But as the popularity of the boy bands gradually began to wane, plaintiffs claim that MTV dumped Pearlman to create Making the Band 2 with P. Diddy, seeking to infuse the show with new blood and cater to a hip-hop/R&B audience.

According to their 66-page complaint, Trans Continental and Kapila claim that Pearlman's production company was slowly squeezed out of the joint venture as MTV reneged on promises to share profits from advertising revenue, spin-offs and other related projects.

MTV maintains the joint venture contract states that Trans Continental's interests were extinguished when the Making the Band 2 franchise began airing in 2002 on MTV with P. Diddy as the centerpiece instead of O-Town. (O-Town broke up in late 2003.)

The case was scheduled to go to mediation in July, with both sides agreeing on Miami entertainment lawyer Leslie Zigel, a former Greenberg Traurig partner and vice president of business and legal affairs at BMG, serving as mediator. But the change in outside counsel by MTV would likely delay that scenario.

Sources say that MTV was upset with the level of court activity in the case and that depositions haven't gone well for MTV in the early going. (Some of those depos could eventually include P. Diddy himself, who if the case goes to trial, will likely be a witness.)


Brian Baxter is a Staff Reporter for American Lawyer, a sibling publication of Entertainment Law & Finance.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Overview of Regulatory Guidance Governing the Use of AI Systems In the Workplace Image

Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.

Is Google Search Dead? How AI Is Reshaping Search and SEO Image

This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.

While Federal Legislation Flounders, State Privacy Laws for Children and Teens Gain Momentum Image

For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.

Revolutionizing Workplace Design: A Perspective from Gray Reed Image

In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.

From DeepSeek to Distillation: Protecting IP In An AI World Image

Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.