Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Feb. 1, 2009, amendments to certain provisions of New York law went into effect that will have a profound effect on the manner in which New York employers review job applications, especially from applicants who have a record of criminal offenses. The obligations imposed by these amendments arise from the interaction of three separate sections of the New York consolidated laws: the Labor Law, the General Business Law, and the Correction Law. Employers will thus need to familiarize themselves with the requirements of each section in order to comply with the new amendments effectively.
The new amendments, codified at New York Labor Law ' 201-f and New York General Business Law ” 380-c(b)(2) and 380-g(d) (collectively the “New Amendments”), help to effectuate Article 23-A of New York's Correction Law (“Article 23-A”), which prohibits employment discrimination based on an individual's having committed one or more “criminal offenses.” The New Amendments require, among other things, that the employer give notice of Article 23-A to applicants and employees and provide a written explanation (if requested) to any applicant who is denied employment after disclosing a prior criminal offense.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.