Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Who's Your Client?

By Thomas E. Spahn
July 28, 2009

A federal judge recently concluded in a widely reported option backdating case that the California law firm Irell & Manella had “compromised ' important principles” involving the “fair administration of justice.” United States v. Nicholas, 606 F. Supp. 2d 1109, 1112 (C.D. Cal. 2009). After finding that the firm had improperly disclosed one client's confidences to benefit another firm client, the court said it could not “overlook Irell's ethical misconduct in this regard and must refer Irell to the State Bar for appropriate discipline.”

This case highlights the risks that all lawyers run when they do not properly identify their client. An attorney-client relationship triggers all the lawyer's ethical duties and defines who owns the attorney-client privilege itself. As with many other ethical pitfalls for attorneys, the risks are much higher in the murky world where clients face criminal jeopardy. The criminal process not only threatens a client's liberty but also adds a constitutional dimension to the protections afforded clients by state law and professional ethics.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.