Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In her dissenting opinion in Ricci v. DeStefano, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg posited that the disparate impact theory has been central to effective enforcement of Title VII for decades. Indeed, disparate impact cases have successfully challenged unnecessary barriers to equal employment opportunity for decades. Disparate impact theory has prompted employers to develop selection processes that are both fair and effective.
On June 29, 2009, the Court took a step backwards on the path toward fulfilling Title VII's promise of equal opportunity. In another 5-4 decision, the Court ruled that the City of New Haven, CT, violated Title VII when it failed to promote firefighters on the basis of tests that screened out nearly all of the minority firefighters who took them. The Court rejected evidence of flaws in the tests and alternative testing procedures that would be expected to lessen the disparate impact. With this ruling, the Court provided a powerful disincentive for employers to seek less discriminatory alternatives when a screening device proves to screen out members of a protected class disproportionately.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.