Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Twenty years ago, a defense attorney might have sighed with relief to hear an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) say that a client was only a “witness,” or would not be prosecuted, or would be immunized in return for truthful cooperation in the government's investigation. These days, not so fast. In our digitized-globalized era, assurances from one jurisdiction may not insulate a client from prosecution across the country or even around the globe.
Examples abound of the ever-increasing collaboration between state, federal and foreign law enforcement authorities: parallel Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and bribery investigations here and abroad; U.S. prosecution of foreign nationals like Canadian media magnate Conrad Black for “honest services fraud” or of three British bankers in connection with the Enron meltdown; and the intensified investigations of U.S. businesses by European antitrust authorities, just to name a few. Protecting one's client has become a multi-dimensional chess game. Accordingly, if your client has leverage to bargain with prosecutors, take care to negotiate protection that matches the jurisdictional risk profile of the suspect conduct.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.