Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Infringement Suit Against Tim McGraw Is Dismissed

By Stan Soocher
August 27, 2009

The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee granted a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss on the pleadings a copyright infringement suit against country artist Tim McGraw. Martinez v. McGraw, 3:08-0738. Plaintiff James Martinez alleged that the McGraw track “Everywhere,” by songwriters and co-defendants Craig Wiseman and Mike Reid, infringed on Martinez's song “Anytime, Anywhere Amanda.” To survive a 12(b)(6) motion under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a complaint needn't contain factual allegations that are detailed but must be more than speculative.

Senior District Judge John T. Nixon noted: “Mr. Martinez fails to assert factual allegations that raise a right to relief above the speculative level. In the Complaint, Mr. Martinez alleges that Terri Clark, a non-party musician, recorded a song with a title that is comprised of a common phrase [i.e., 'easy on the eyes'] also used by Plaintiff in his song title ['Easy on the Eyes, Hard on the Heart']. Mr. Martinez then alleges that both Ms. Clark and Mr. McGraw used the same studio to record their albums and used some of the same songwriters and personnel to create their albums. Plaintiff concludes that this tenuous string of facts resulted in Defendants having access to Plaintiff's song. Yet, Plaintiff fails to state facts that could raise even an inference of access. Plaintiff does not allege how his song “Anytime, Anywhere Amanda” got into the hands of Ms. Clark's personnel and songwriters or even that his song was played in hearing range of Ms. Clark's personnel and songwriters or that Ms. Clark's personnel and songwriters had any contact with Plaintiff or Plaintiff's [CD] Collection. Instead, Plaintiff relies on the fact that Ms. Clark produced a song entitled, 'You're Easy on the Eyes,' that contains a well-known phrase, which is similar to Plaintiff's song titled, 'Easy on the Eyes, Hard on the [Heart]'.” (McGraw's Everywhere album had a song titled “Hard on the Ticker.”)

Martinez also sought a declaratory ruling that he owned the copyright to “Anytime, Anywhere Amanda.” But the district court noted that “Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate to the [c]ourt that there is an 'actual controversy' (28 U.S.C. '2201(a) (2009)) regarding the ownership of 'Anytime, Anywhere Amanda.' Plaintiff does not allege that Defendants ever claimed a right to Plaintiff's song at issue. ' Furthermore, an award of ownership over an infringing work is not a remedy provided under the Copyright Act for copyright infringement.”

|
Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance. He is also an entertainment attorney, book author and Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver campus. He can be reached at [email protected].

The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee granted a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss on the pleadings a copyright infringement suit against country artist Tim McGraw. Martinez v. McGraw, 3:08-0738. Plaintiff James Martinez alleged that the McGraw track “Everywhere,” by songwriters and co-defendants Craig Wiseman and Mike Reid, infringed on Martinez's song “Anytime, Anywhere Amanda.” To survive a 12(b)(6) motion under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a complaint needn't contain factual allegations that are detailed but must be more than speculative.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Yachts, Jets, Horses & Hooch: Specialized Commercial Leasing Models Image

Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.

Hyperlinked Documents: The Latest e-Discovery Challenge Image

As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.

Identifying Your Practice's Differentiator Image

How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.

Risks and Ad Fraud Protection In Digital Advertising Image

The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.

Turning Business Development Plans Into Reality Image

This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.