Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Tenth Circuit Holds That Insider Trading 'Gain' Is Limited to the Portion of Profit Attributable to Defendant's Criminal Conduct
In United States v. Nacchio, No. 07-1311, 2009 WL 2343716 (10th Cir. July 31, 2009), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that a district court's sentencing order relied on an improper calculation of the defendant's “gain resulting from the offense” of insider trading because it was not limited to the gain specifically attributable to his criminal conduct. The Tenth Circuit also held that the district court erred in requiring the defendant to forfeit the gross amount of his criminal stock transactions rather than his net profit from those transactions.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.