Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Corporate CounselorKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

International Restrictions on Releasing Personal Information

By M. James Daley and Laura Clark Fey
September 29, 2009

In June, data privacy experts from around the globe converged in Barcelona, Spain for The Sedona Conference's' International Programme on Cross-Border eDiscovery and Data Privacy. Participants, ranging from academics to data commissioners to judges to in-house and outside counsel from countries throughout North America, South America, Europe, Asia and Australia, gathered to dialogue on the legal, technology and cultural challenges posed by cross-border discovery conflicts. A wide variety of ideas were shared, but participants recognized that this international dilemma is not going to be solved overnight.

The challenge can be summarized as follows: With the globalization of business and the resultant flow of data across country borders, data sought in litigation, particularly litigation involving multinational corporations, increasingly includes personal information relating to employees, customers and/or clients that is located in foreign countries. A significant amount of that data is in the form of e-mails, which are recognized as personal data in most of the world other than the United States. The dilemma confronted by corporate counsel involved in such litigation is whether to disclose personal information located in foreign countries with laws that severely restrict the processing and transfer of personal data and risk being punished there with civil and/or criminal penalties; or to filter out the personal data and risk being sanctioned in the U.S. for incomplete responses to e-discovery requests.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.