Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Jury Finds Against Film Producers In Bribery Case

By Mike Scarcella
September 29, 2009

A pair of Beverly Hills film producers have been found guilty of conspiring to bribe a former Thai government official to obtain contracts that provided for, among other things, control of the annual Bangkok International Film Festival, the Justice Department said. A jury in California found Gerald Green, 77, and Patricia Green, 52, guilty of money laundering and conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). A jury also found substantive violations under the FCPA, a higher evidentiary hurdle than proving the conspiracy charge.

The Greens are scheduled for sentencing Dec. 17 before Judge George Wu of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Trial in the closely watched federal court case lasted nearly three weeks. FCPA trials are rare, and this case is one of the first against the movie industry.

“As these convictions demonstrate, the Department of Justice will not waiver in its fight against corruption, whether perpetrated within our borders or abroad,” said Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer in a statement.

A superceding indictment in March charged the Greens with paying $1.8 million in bribes between 2002 and 2007 to Juthamas Siriwan, the former governor of the Tourism Authority of Thailand, in exchange for receiving contracts, including one to manage and operate the Bangkok International Film Festival. Businesses owned by the Greens, according to Justice, earned $13.5 million from the contracts.

Justice officials said the kickbacks were paid through banks in Singapore and the United Kingdom in the name of the former governor's daughter and a friend of the governor. Prosecutors said the Greens used different business names ' some with fake addresses and telephone numbers ' to hide the money they were making on the contracts.

The conspiracy and other FCPA charges carry a maximum penalty of five years each in prison. The money laundering counts carry a maximum penalty of up to 20 years each in prison.

Jerome Mooney, a partner at Los Angeles-based Weston, Garrou, Walters & Mooney, who represents Gerald Green, says: “This case fires a shot across the bow of Hollywood. Unfortunately that shot landed in my client's boat.” Mooney calls the Greens “fundamentally good people. A prison sentence of any length for these people in this case would be obscene.”

Senior trial attorney Jonathan Lopez of the Fraud Section of the Justice Department's Criminal Division prosecuted the case with Assistant U.S. Attorney Bruce Searby of the Central District of California.


Mike ScarcellaThe Legal TimesEntertainment Law & Finance

A pair of Beverly Hills film producers have been found guilty of conspiring to bribe a former Thai government official to obtain contracts that provided for, among other things, control of the annual Bangkok International Film Festival, the Justice Department said. A jury in California found Gerald Green, 77, and Patricia Green, 52, guilty of money laundering and conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). A jury also found substantive violations under the FCPA, a higher evidentiary hurdle than proving the conspiracy charge.

The Greens are scheduled for sentencing Dec. 17 before Judge George Wu of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Trial in the closely watched federal court case lasted nearly three weeks. FCPA trials are rare, and this case is one of the first against the movie industry.

“As these convictions demonstrate, the Department of Justice will not waiver in its fight against corruption, whether perpetrated within our borders or abroad,” said Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer in a statement.

A superceding indictment in March charged the Greens with paying $1.8 million in bribes between 2002 and 2007 to Juthamas Siriwan, the former governor of the Tourism Authority of Thailand, in exchange for receiving contracts, including one to manage and operate the Bangkok International Film Festival. Businesses owned by the Greens, according to Justice, earned $13.5 million from the contracts.

Justice officials said the kickbacks were paid through banks in Singapore and the United Kingdom in the name of the former governor's daughter and a friend of the governor. Prosecutors said the Greens used different business names ' some with fake addresses and telephone numbers ' to hide the money they were making on the contracts.

The conspiracy and other FCPA charges carry a maximum penalty of five years each in prison. The money laundering counts carry a maximum penalty of up to 20 years each in prison.

Jerome Mooney, a partner at Los Angeles-based Weston, Garrou, Walters & Mooney, who represents Gerald Green, says: “This case fires a shot across the bow of Hollywood. Unfortunately that shot landed in my client's boat.” Mooney calls the Greens “fundamentally good people. A prison sentence of any length for these people in this case would be obscene.”

Senior trial attorney Jonathan Lopez of the Fraud Section of the Justice Department's Criminal Division prosecuted the case with Assistant U.S. Attorney Bruce Searby of the Central District of California.


Mike ScarcellaThe Legal TimesEntertainment Law & Finance

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.