Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Implied Covenant of Good Faith
Failure to open a store was not a breach of the lease. Jefferson City Commons LLC v. Moran Foods Inc., 08 Civ. 4866, S.D.N.Y., May 21, 2009.
A Texas shopping center's operator sued a grocery store chain for breach of lease by failing to open a supermarket. Its amended complaint seeking base rent, additional rent, and attorneys' fees was expanded to include a claim for damages for rent and expenses lost from other tenants and diminution of the shopping center's value. Discussing lease ' 6.2, the court held that if liability is established, the plaintiff operator could recover only base rent, additional rent, and attorneys' fees. Contrary to the plaintiff's argument, ' 6.2 ' providing that the defendant had no obligation to open any business at the leased premises ' was not applicable solely in a situation in which a tenant later finds its business location unprofitable. In finding that the defendant's failure to open a grocery store did not breach the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, the court noted that the implied covenant is not breached where a party merely exercises rights afforded it under the lease agreement.
Premises Liability
A woman was awarded $4.4M in a fall that caused brain injury, Lopez v. Minyard Food Stores Inc., No. DC-07-0142, Dallas County District Court, 95th, TX, 06-26-2009.
In 2005, Liria Lopez, then 49, slipped on water that had accumulated near the entrance of a Minyard Food Store in Dallas, fracturing her right knee. In the following months, Lopez developed a movement disorder, experienced memory lapses and had troubles with concentration and speech. Almost two years later, she was diagnosed with a closed head injury, which her doctors claimed was caused by the incident. Due to the brain injury, Lopez is unable to work and had to move in with a relative because she needs constant care and supervision. Lopez alleged that she fell because the store failed to lay out mats or warn patrons of the water on the floor. A jury awarded her $4.4 million.
Implied Covenant of Good Faith
Failure to open a store was not a breach of the lease. Jefferson City Commons LLC v. Moran Foods Inc., 08 Civ. 4866, S.D.N.Y., May 21, 2009.
A Texas shopping center's operator sued a grocery store chain for breach of lease by failing to open a supermarket. Its amended complaint seeking base rent, additional rent, and attorneys' fees was expanded to include a claim for damages for rent and expenses lost from other tenants and diminution of the shopping center's value. Discussing lease ' 6.2, the court held that if liability is established, the plaintiff operator could recover only base rent, additional rent, and attorneys' fees. Contrary to the plaintiff's argument, ' 6.2 ' providing that the defendant had no obligation to open any business at the leased premises ' was not applicable solely in a situation in which a tenant later finds its business location unprofitable. In finding that the defendant's failure to open a grocery store did not breach the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, the court noted that the implied covenant is not breached where a party merely exercises rights afforded it under the lease agreement.
Premises Liability
A woman was awarded $4.4M in a fall that caused brain injury, Lopez v. Minyard Food Stores Inc., No. DC-07-0142, Dallas County District Court, 95th, TX, 06-26-2009.
In 2005, Liria Lopez, then 49, slipped on water that had accumulated near the entrance of a Minyard Food Store in Dallas, fracturing her right knee. In the following months, Lopez developed a movement disorder, experienced memory lapses and had troubles with concentration and speech. Almost two years later, she was diagnosed with a closed head injury, which her doctors claimed was caused by the incident. Due to the brain injury, Lopez is unable to work and had to move in with a relative because she needs constant care and supervision. Lopez alleged that she fell because the store failed to lay out mats or warn patrons of the water on the floor. A jury awarded her $4.4 million.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.