Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
If an employee orally complains to a supervisor about the employer's wage practices, which he believes violate the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), has the employee engaged in protected activity that may form the predicate to a claim of retaliation under the FLSA? The Seventh Circuit recently answered this question in the negative in Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 13913 (7th Cir. June 29, 2009). The court so held because the employee's strictly oral complaints about allegedly improper wage practices did not implicate the FLSA's prohibition of retaliation against those who have “filed any complaint.” 29 U.S.C. ' 215(a)(3) (emphasis added). In light of this holding, members of both the plaintiff's and defense bar are now asking: if the Seventh Circuit got it right in Kasten, what is the practice impact of the decision, and what is the viability, under other federal anti-discrimination statutes, of retaliation claims that are predicated solely on employees' oral complaints of allegedly illegal conduct by employers?
The Kasten Decision
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.