Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
If an employee orally complains to a supervisor about the employer's wage practices, which he believes violate the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), has the employee engaged in protected activity that may form the predicate to a claim of retaliation under the FLSA? The Seventh Circuit recently answered this question in the negative in Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 13913 (7th Cir. June 29, 2009). The court so held because the employee's strictly oral complaints about allegedly improper wage practices did not implicate the FLSA's prohibition of retaliation against those who have “filed any complaint.” 29 U.S.C. ' 215(a)(3) (emphasis added). In light of this holding, members of both the plaintiff's and defense bar are now asking: if the Seventh Circuit got it right in Kasten, what is the practice impact of the decision, and what is the viability, under other federal anti-discrimination statutes, of retaliation claims that are predicated solely on employees' oral complaints of allegedly illegal conduct by employers?
The Kasten Decision
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.