Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Bank Not Liable for Unauthorized Film Loan Transfer
The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey ruled that a film investor incurred no recoverable damages when a bank made an unauthorized transfer of money from his account to a film company to which the investor was obligated to pay the funds. Frungillo v. Imperia Entertainment Inc., 08-0908 (DRD). Michael Frungillo had agreed to loan $250,000 for production of the independent martial-arts film Never Submit. But he alleged in his lawsuit that Wachovia Bank had violated the Uniform Commercial Code and New Jersey banking statutes when it transferred the money from his account to Never Submit LLC without his permission. Senior District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise noted, however, in an unpublished opinion: “Wachovia's actions ' regardless of whether they violated the security procedures governing Mr. Frungillo's account ' did nothing more than place Mr. Frungillo in the position that he was obligated to assume under his contract with [the film production company]. Therefore, Mr. Frungillo may not recover compensatory damages from Wachovia as a result of the transfer.
Disney Owns “Pooh” Copyrights and Trademarks
The U.S. District for the District of California ruled in favor of Disney Enterprises on copyright, trade dress and trademark claims brought by the assignee of “Winnie the Pooh” author A.A. Milne. Milne v. Stephen Slesinger Inc. (SSI), 2:02-cv-08508-FMC-PLAx. SSI had obtained rights from Milne and Milne trustees through a series of agreements between 1930 and 1983. The later agreements gave U.S. and Canadian exploitation rights to Disney. U.S. District Judge Florence-Marie Cooper found: “Significantly, nowhere in its motion papers does SSI identify precisely what rights it believes it retained. ' Although SSI now claims copyright and trademark rights in the works, no evidence has been offered that SSI ever attempted to perfect or register any such rights, prior to the filing of these counterclaims. Disney, on the other hand, registered at least 15 trademarks based on the Pooh works in the United States, between 1983 and 2006. In 2004, Disney registered copyrights in 45 works featuring Pooh characters, and renewed copyright registrations for another 14 such works.”
Bank Not Liable for Unauthorized Film Loan Transfer
The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey ruled that a film investor incurred no recoverable damages when a bank made an unauthorized transfer of money from his account to a film company to which the investor was obligated to pay the funds. Frungillo v. Imperia Entertainment Inc., 08-0908 (DRD). Michael Frungillo had agreed to loan $250,000 for production of the independent martial-arts film Never Submit. But he alleged in his lawsuit that
Disney Owns “Pooh” Copyrights and Trademarks
The U.S. District for the District of California ruled in favor of Disney Enterprises on copyright, trade dress and trademark claims brought by the assignee of “Winnie the Pooh” author A.A. Milne. Milne v. Stephen Slesinger Inc. (SSI), 2:02-cv-08508-FMC-PLAx. SSI had obtained rights from Milne and Milne trustees through a series of agreements between 1930 and 1983. The later agreements gave U.S. and Canadian exploitation rights to Disney. U.S. District Judge
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.