Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Over the last ten years, U.S. corporations conducting business outside the country have witnessed a dramatic increase in the enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and the severity of the financial penalties assessed. Over the past five years, they have also experienced a significant rise in the passage and enforcement of anti-corruption laws in countries outside the U.S. Efforts to parlay violations into various private civil lawsuits have also emerged. And now, the slate of available enforcement options appears to be expanding beyond the corporate entity. Both the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have recently announced that they will not only prosecute the individuals involved in paying the bribes, but also the executives who arguably should have prevented it.
Enforcement officials have set their sights squarely on the culpable individual as high up in the organization as possible. Individual liability could be more of a danger in cases under the laws of other countries. In China, for example, it has been a matter of losing one's head.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.