Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Over the past several months, behind-the-scenes “legislative wrangling” has led to several proposed modifications to the poorly titled Employee Free Choice Act (“EFCA”), a bill currently pending in both the House and Senate. These modifications apparently will result in the elimination from EFCA of the “undemocratic” provisions concerning card check (as the sole way to determine if employees want a union) and the restoration of secret ballot elections as the primary means of determining if employees desire union representation. In doing so, however, legislators will likely modify the bill by significantly shortening the period in which elections are held after a union requests an election (from the traditional 42 days to approximately 10 days). The rationale behind such a move is that while card checks obviate traditional democratic principles, shortened periods for union elections will permit unions to operate stealthily and curtail management's options for presenting its own case of why workers should not join unions. It is obvious that the significantly shortened election period is intended to increase the current success rate of union organizing efforts.
The revised version of EFCA will still provide for huge fines (up to $20,000 per violation) for any employer that violates the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) during an organizing drive or during negotiations for a first contract. EFCA also will continue to mandate binding arbitration for those items that management and the union cannot agree upon in negotiating that first contract. In effect, government arbitrators will impose a labor relations contract on companies that cannot reach agreement with new unions.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.