Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Med Mal News

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
November 25, 2009

Sexual Relationships with Patients Not Constitutionally Protected

The New York court system's Appellate Division has upheld the revocation of a psychiatrist's license, based on findings by the state's Board for Professional Medical Conduct that the doctor had not only provided substandard care in several instances, but had carried on sexual relationships with two of his patients. The doctor, Rochester physician Carmen A. D'Angelo, argued in his appeal that the state regulators' actions against him violated his constitutional rights to court and marry the person of his choice (he later became engaged to one of the patients with whom he had had a sexual relationship). He also asked the court to abandon its own holding in Matter of Miller v. Commissioner of Health for State of N.Y., 270 AD2d 584 (2000), which said that the state's legislature did not mean to grant its approval of physician/patient sexual relationships simply because it had failed to specifically discuss such liaisons in its legislation addressing a physician's lack of moral fitness to practice medicine (Education Law ' 6530(20)). Psychiatrists, on the other hand, are explicitly barred from having sexual contact with patients under Education Law ' 6530(44). “Petitioner urges this Court to overrule this precedent, asserting that his constitutionally guaranteed liberty interest which protects his right to marriage encompasses a right to activities related to marriage and courtship, including ' astoundingly ' the right to engage in extramarital sexual relationships with his patients,” Justice Edward O. Spain wrote for the five-member court in Matter of D'Angelo v. State Board for Professional Medical Conduct. “We are unpersuaded that our interpretation of the Legislature's intent, undisturbed now for over nine years, was in error,” the court concluded.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The Bankruptcy Hotline Image

Recent cases of importance to your practice.

How AI Has Affected PR Image

When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.